Subject	Re: BUT....
Posted by	crazydonkey on May 18, 2003 at 8:40 PM
	This message has been viewed 18 times.
In Reply To	BUT.... posted by MrSex-Z on May 18, 2003 at 07:55 PM
Message	well, with a hydro, i have more flexibility of where things go...the supercharger that interfaces with the belt directly would be eaiser, but probably more evpensive and it might not fit in space i have available. With the hydro, i have more elbow room
Follow Ups	supercharging!!! - crazydonkey 16:41:50 05/18/03 hmm, sounds interesting, though the placement of it >>>> - Chickan_Z (OH) 17:01:29 05/18/03 Anything's possible - Tredmil 17:14:58 05/18/03 Re: Anything's possible - crazydonkey 17:17:11 05/18/03 I guess I read it wrong - Tredmil 17:24:21 05/18/03 Re: I guess I read it wrong - crazydonkey 17:27:34 05/18/03 Re: supercharging!!! - crazydonkey 17:28:19 05/18/03 Only if you want flames for double posting. (n/m) - my91z 17:32:07 05/18/03 Dont double post. Just leave it here (n/m) - acidW4rp (MA) 17:35:18 05/18/03 Re: supercharging!!! - Patrick 19:06:05 05/18/03 Re: Re: supercharging!!! - crazydonkey 19:47:31 05/18/03 Its called a centrifical SC, been around for a long time (n/m) - Snoguitar 19:49:14 05/18/03 long long time - CarlCuro 20:44:31 05/18/03 Re: supercharging!!! - MrSex-Z 19:16:13 05/18/03 ummm..... ? (n/m) - Deja_Vu 20:54:37 05/18/03 How about Hydro-Charging? - ZcraZy 19:18:56 05/18/03 Re: How about Hydro-Charging? - crazydonkey 19:49:34 05/18/03 BUT.... - MrSex-Z 19:55:25 05/18/03 Did you not read his post? (n/m) - Snoguitar 20:02:20 05/18/03 Re: BUT.... - crazydonkey 20:40:46 05/18/03 Hydropneumatic engine supercharger system patent #5,904,045 - yummy18268 00:16:08 05/19/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.